Showing posts with label Corporate Income Tax. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Corporate Income Tax. Show all posts

Thursday, May 14, 2020

BILL No 1210: CORPORATE INCOME TAX (INTERNAL TAXATION)

Unfortunately, the situation with signing the Bill № 1210 by the President of Ukraine, which significantly “redraws” the Tax Code of Ukraine, is still unclear.

At the same time, given that the chances of its signing by the President are, in my opinion, are fairly high, I decided to publish a series of concise publications outlining the key changes that await all of us in Ukraine, if the Bill becomes an Act.

Publication № 1: corporate income tax (internal taxation):

- The threshold of annual revenue for those taxpayers who may not take into account tax differences and file tax returns once a year increases from UAH 20 to 40 million (paragraph 134.1.1 and paragraph 137.5 of the Tax Code);

- The value of assets that count as fixed assets and are subject to depreciation increases from UAH 6,000 to UAH 20,000 (paragraph 14.1.138 of the Tax Code).

Thursday, March 26, 2015

Corporate Income Tax: Reloaded

Co-authored by Anton Babak 

Within the scope of the Tax Reform of 2015 the Corporate Income Chapter of the Tax Code of Ukraine has been completely recast. What follows is a brief description of new corporate income tax (“CIT”) rules mainly being in force as from 1 January 2015.

General Changes

-  CIT is no more levied on profits determined under special tax accounting rules. It is now levied on pre-tax profits calculated in accordance with book accounting standards, but subject to certain adjustments (tax differences);

- Tax differences are not mandatory for small enterprises (with annual income up to UAH 20 million). They may opt for not to apply the tax differences. In this case CIT is chargeable on the amount of “raw” book profits;

- Tax authorities has obtained the right to audit book accounts of taxpayers (either under the Ukrainian GAAP or the IFRS). This does not come as a surprise as at present book profits do make up the basis of the tax assessment;

- Approach to the expenditures that are not associated with the conduct of the taxpayer's business has dramatically changed. As for now, these expenditures are generally allowable;

- 4% limitation on the deductibility of consulting, marketing, advertising and engineering services bought from non-residents do not apply anymore;

- Borrowers under inter-companies interest free loans are no more chargeable to CIT on the deemed interest accrued on such loans and in certain cases on the principal of such loans;

Tax Differences

- Depreciation and amortization: special depreciation and amortization rules provided by the Tax Code of Ukraine apply. They do not differ in any material respect from those being in effect formerly;

- Transfer pricing rules: pre-tax book profits can be increased taking account of differences between arm’s length and contractual prices;

- Thin-capitalization rules: certain interest expenses incurred in respect of related non-residents are now disallowed. The restriction normally applies to taxpayers whose debt-to-equity ratio exceeds 3.5 (for banks and financial organizations - 10);

- Purchases from residents of blacklisted jurisdictions and non-profit organizations: a deductibility restriction is now set at 70% of the amount of the actual expense. The restriction can be overridden where the taxpayer is able to justify under transfer pricing rules the arm’s length character of the underlying transactions;

- Royalty: deductibility restrictions essentially remain the same as before (e.g. a full non-deductibility of royalties paid out to residents of blacklisted jurisdictions and a 4% restriction on the deductibility of royalties paid out to other non-residents). The novelty is that the above restrictions can now be circumvented where the taxpayer is able to justify under transfer pricing rules the arm’s length character of the underlying transactions;

- Transactions in securities: special tax accounting rules disabling the utilization of securities-related losses remain in force.

Administration Novelties


- New rules concerning advance CIT on dividends operates. Advance CIT is nowadays payable not on the full amount of the dividend distribution, but only on the excess of this amount over the taxed profits of the corresponding tax period;

- New rules with regard to filing tax returns and paying monthly advance payments have been laid down (will be effective from 2016). The new deadline for filing annual tax returns will be 1 June of the year following the tax year. The threshold for those required to pay monthly advance payments of CIT will increase to UAH 20 million of the annual income (as against current UAH 10 million). A twelve-month period for the calculation of monthly advance payments will be determined from June of the current tax year through May of the next tax year (as against the present March-February period).

* - Photo from http://www.chud.com

Monday, November 12, 2012

Tax losses of previous periods: resetting of securities accounting



The confrontation ended in May 2012, as amendments were made to the Tax Code (paragraph 3 of Chapter 4 of Part XX), whereby:

- taxpayers whose income in 2011 was below UAH 1 million, are permitted to carry forward such losses in full, based on the results of the first half of 2012;

- taxpayers whose income in 2011 equaled to, or exceeded UAH 1 million, are permitted to carry forward such losses by degrees: 25% following the results of the first half of 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

Tax officers decided not to stop at what has been achieved and interpret the above amendments to the Tax Code to their maximum benefit (to raise additional public revenues).

This time, it hurt taxpayers that carry out securities transactions, mostly banks and securities dealers. In its letter No. 320/0/71-12/15-1217 “On Reflecting the Negative Financial Performance of Securities and Derivatives Transactions in 2012-2015”, dated 9 August 2012, the State Tax Service of Ukraine explained that the provision of the Tax Code related to the 25% partial carrying forward of tax losses incurred before January 1, 2011 in 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015, is also applicable to the tax losses of securities and derivatives transactions carried out by taxpayers whose income in 2011 equaled to, or exceeded UAH 1 million.

Therefore, in the opinion of the State Tax Service of Ukraine, corporate profit tax payers whose income in 2011 equaled to, or exceeded UAH 1 million have the right to carry forward in 2012 only 25% of the amount of tax losses of securities and derivative transactions accumulated as of 1 January 2012. They will be entitled to carry forward the rest of such losses in 2013, 2014 and 2015 – 25% for each year, respectively.

The tax losses to which the above-mentioned provisions of the Tax Code (regarding the gradual carrying forward during 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015) are applied, and the tax losses of securities and derivatives transactions are two completely different things. Consequently, taxpayers and tax lawyers/advisors unanimously state that it is groundless on the part of the tax authorities to apply the 25% restriction to securities and derivatives tax accounting.

Even the Committee of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on Finance, Banking, Tax and Customs Policy made a comment regarding this issue. In its letter No. 04-39/10-990 of 10 September 2012, the Committee supported taxpayers and pointed out that it is groundless for the tax authorities to apply the 25% restriction to tax accounting of securities and derivatives transactions.

Be that as it may, the tax authorities stand their ground and actively implement the said letter of the State Tax Service of Ukraine. Under such circumstances, a large number of judicial disputes may arise between the tax authorities and taxpayers on applying the 25% restriction to securities and derivative tax accounting.

To date, some decisions related to the problem in question can be found in the Uniform State Register of Court Decisions (for instance, a case concerning the claim lodged by Subsidiary enterprise “Polygraphic combine “Zorya” to the District State Tax Service – the Central Office for Servicing Large Taxpayers, http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/26237868). Unfortunately, in the above case the court did not analyze the lawfulness of applying the 25% restriction to securities and derivatives tax accounting, and refused to initiate proceedings, being governed solely by procedural rules.

No one knows how this story will end and what the court practice in cases on applying the 25% restriction to securities and derivative accounting will be like. Looking at the issue of carrying forward losses incurred by 1 January 2011, the court practice will hardly be unambiguous.

It is most likely that courts, depending on their preferences and the level of concern about raising public revenues, will make decisions both in favor of taxpayers and in favor of the tax authorities. It can even be assumed that the matter will be put to rest on a lawmaker – amendments that will be made to the Tax Code will establish whether the 25% restriction should be applied to tax accounting of securities and derivatives transactions. Hopefully, such amendments will provide that the above restriction will not be applied. However, somewhere deep inside there is a feeling that things will turn out the opposite of what we expect.