Showing posts with label VAT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label VAT. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 5, 2023

Changes to Procedure for Suspension of Registration of VAT Invoices

I was glad to speak at the meeting of the Committee on Tax and Custom Law of the Ukrainian Bar Association on the topic of the suspension of the registration of VAT invoices.

My speech, in particular, concerned the changes to the procedure for the suspension of the registration of VAT invoices brought by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 1428 dated 23 December 2022. The Resolution entered into force on 11 January 2023. It became a kind of compromise between the interests of business and the government in the light of the unprecedented fiscal pressure caused by the system of the suspension of the registration of VAT invoices in the second half of 2022.

Below is a brief summary of the most important changes introduced by the Resolution:

1) Automatic registration of a VAT invoice in case the tax authorities accept the data table of the VAT taxable person subject to certain conditions (does not apply where the regional commission of the tax authorities has already made a decision to decline the registration of the VAT invoice).

2) Unconditional registration of a VAT invoice. It is possible if there is no decision on the compliance of the VAT taxable person with the criteria of riskiness and the CEO of the taxable person holds a similar position in no more than three VAT taxable persons. For unconditional registration, the amount of supplies in one concerned VAT invoice must not exceed UAH 5,000, and the total monthly amount of supplies must not exceed UAH 500,000.

3) The obligation to indicate in the decision on compliance of the VAT taxable person with the criteria of riskiness the detailed information according to which the compliance of the VAT taxable person with a certain criterion of riskiness is established, including: (i) the type of the transaction (purchase or supply); (ii) period of the transaction; (iii) the code of the product involved; and (iv) information about the counterparty of the VAT taxable person involved in the risky transaction.

4) In the context of the notorious paragraph 8 of the criteria of riskiness, a list of tax information codes was introduced (approved by the order of the State Tax Service of Ukraine dated 11 January 2023 No. 17). The tax information code must be indicated in the decision on compliance of the VAT taxable person with the criteria of riskiness based on the specified paragraph 8. The list of codes practically does not change the situation in favor of VAT taxable persons. It has 18 codes which cover almost all the grounds for the riskiness of the VAT taxable persons that the tax authorities can come up with. In the list, for example, you can find an insufficient number of labor resources, the implementation of the transaction with the counterparty in respect of which a decision has already been made on compliance with the criteria of riskiness, and a number of other common grounds for "riskiness" used by the tax authorities in practice.

Saturday, October 15, 2022

Changes in VAT Regulation During the Period of the Application of Martial Law

I was glad to speak at the meeting of the committee on tax and customs law of the Ukrainian Bar Association on the topic: "Changes in VAT Regulation During the Period of the Application of Martial Law".

Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation into Ukraine on 24 February 2022, a large number of amendments have been made to the Tax Code of Ukraine regarding VAT. 

The following three are the most notable among those amendments:

1) Introduction of a temporary reduced VAT rate of 7% for motor fuels; 

2) Governing the issue of the enjoyment of input VAT deduction without a registered VAT invoice for February-May 2022; and

3) Suspension of the operation of the VAT refund procedure for the period until July 2022.




Thursday, March 23, 2017

Blocking VAT Invoices: Ukrainian Approach

One of the most controversial innovations brought by the mini tax reform of 2017 is the mechanism of blocking the registration of VAT invoices. This will work from 1 April 2017 in a test mode and from 1 July 2017 in a full mode.

What for?

The system of blocked VAT-accounts introduced in 2015 was quite a serious blow to the lucrative business of those providing fraudulent encashments services in Ukraine.

However, the representatives of the “industry” turned out to be smart enough to find a “weak spot” in the system of blocked VAT-accounts and began to exploit it actively.

Despite its advancement, the system of blocked VAT-accounts is absolutely powerless against abuses involving supplies to non-taxable persons.

For example, a non-bona fide taxable person  buys on the domestic market or imports a batch of smartphones. Then it resells them to non-taxable third parties and obtain cash or even bank transfer payments in the amount sufficient for recovering the VAT incurred on the purchase of the smartphones. As a matter of fact, the non-bona fide taxable person does not declare output VAT arising from the supply of the smartphones and does not register a VAT invoice.

Consequently, the non-bona fide taxable person retains the input VAT deduction that can be "sold" to those interested in saving on remitting due VAT to the tax authorities. The buyer receives a "set of documents" attesting his entitlement to the input VAT deduction.

Nonetheless, there is a small issue for the parties to the trickery. In most cases, the buyer of the input VAT deduction is not interested in the goods actually sold by the non-bona fide taxable person (in our example - smartphones). So, the "set of documents" for the buyer is produced for the sale of something else: for example, much-favoured "consulting and information services".

In view of the fact that the implementation of the scheme entails the "transformation" of one product to another (in our example, smartphones are transformed into services), the scheme has received the popular name "twist". The very such "twists" are exactly what the blocking mechanism is called to counteract.

How will this work?

The blocking mechanism is as follows:

1) In case of the detection of a "twist", the tax authorities send a document  to the taxable person on the suspension of the registration of the tax invoice.

2) The taxable person has the right to submit to the tax authorities his written explanation (with the attachment of the supportive documents) in order to confirm the lawfulness of the registration of the tax invoice.

3) The explanation of the taxable person is considered by a special commission of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine within 5 business days from the date of the receipt. Based on the results of the consideration, the commission takes a decision on the registration/refusal to register the tax invoice.

4) The taxable person has the right to appeal from the decision of the commission under the administrative and /or judicial procedure.

Conclusions and reservations

The mechanism for blocking the registration of tax invoices is absolutely necessary to counter VAT fraud. At the same time, the blocking mechanism entails significant risks for bona fide taxable persons. The latter risk to fall into disgrace of taxmen endowed with new broad powers.

By and large, much depends on how well statutory instruments determining grounds for suspending / canceling the registration of tax invoices are worked out. The adoption of such instrument is entrusted to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine and the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine.

It is crucially important that grounds for suspending / canceling the registration of tax invoices are formulated with utmost precision and with due regard for the sound balance of interests of the tax authorities and bona fide taxable persons. Given the complexity of the issue and the high dependence of the decisions on the specific circumstances of the case, the task is not simple even for the authentic tax luminaries.

Let us hope for the best!


* Photo from youtube.com

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Blocked VAT-Accounts Finally Get Started

Co-authored by Andrii Kuleba 
 (Junior Associate of 
Lavrynovych & Partners Law Firm)
Ukraine has finally implemented the system of blocked VAT-accounts to combat VAT-fraud. Ukrainian system of blocked VAT-accounts is innovative and does not have any equivalents in the world. It is based on a prepayment principle. A supplier in first place remits VAT to his blocked VAT account, and only after that the purchaser can enjoy his resultant input VAT deduction.

There is a special formula to calculate the limit on issuance of VAT invoices. Under this formula the maximum amount for which a supplier is permitted to issue a VAT invoice is determined taking account of his input VAT. Should the supplier intends to issue a VAT invoice for the amount exceeding one calculated according to the formula, he first needs to deposit additional funds to his blocked VAT-account.

The system of blocked VAT-accounts also entails the fully electronic administration of VAT:

- VAT invoices and VAT returns are issued/filed in electronic format only;

- All VAT invoices are subject to registration in the electronic register maintained by the state fiscal authorities. Only based on VAT invoices registered with the above register a purchaser can claim his input VAT deduction.

Blocked VAT-accounts have been in test-mode operation since 1 February 2015. The test-mode operation means that VAT is administered electronically and VAT liabilities are settled towards the state revenues through blocked VAT-accounts. However, over this transitory period of time the limit on issuance of VAT invoices (calculated under the special formula) does not apply. Thus, suppliers are not supposed to finance their blocked VAT-accounts before making taxable supplies in certain cases.

Since 1 July 2015 the system of blocked VAT-accounts will become fully-operational, which first and foremost mean the application of the limit on the issuance of VAT invoices.

It is also worthwhile to mention that the current system of blocked VAT-accounts has been seriously modified in response to the severe criticism of business society in respect of its adverse effect on VAT taxable persons.

First, there is now the real possibility for taxable persons to return the overpayments of tax accumulated in their blocked VAT-accounts.

Second, taxable persons are now given the opportunity to increase the limit on issuance of VAT invoices (calculated under the special formula) by the surplus of their input tax of previous tax periods.

Third, in order to minimize distractions of working capital, the limit on issuance of VAT invoices (calculated under the special formula) will automatically increase by the average monthly amount of VAT liabilities remitted to the state revenues by the taxable persons over the last 12 months.

 

Tuesday, December 9, 2014

VAT-Revolution: Modification

It is more than a month has passed since the publication of the article on the new system of VAT administration. Over this period of time, some important points have shown up. 
 
Firstly, there is a high likelihood of the new administration system being revoked. The revocation of the new system is provided for by the Coalition Agreement. Moreover, the bill No 1141 on the revocation of this system has been registered by the Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian parliament).

Secondly, the blocked VAT-accounts will not be opened at the Clearing Сenter for Servicing Contracts in the Financial Markets. Pursuant to the effective resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 569 such accounts will be rather opened at the State Treasury of Ukraine.

Thirdly, on 4 December 2014, the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine published a methodological document "Basic Rules of the Electronic VAT Administration." The document provides clarification on many aspects of the operation of the new system of administration.

*- Photo from http://www.slovoidilo.ua

Friday, December 5, 2014

Blocked VAT-Accounts: Not That Effective

Over the time that has passed since the publication of my article on the new system of VAT administration, I have lost my illusions as to 100% efficiency of the new system. 

Blocked VAT-accounts are well able to resist VAT-fraud when it comes to transactions between taxable persons. However, they are virtually powerless against VAT-abuses when it comes to transaction between taxable and non-taxable persons. A sham company can supply goods/services to a non-taxable person and fail to declare its output VAT. A limit on the registration of VAT invoices in the unified electronic register will not help here. The sham company just will not issue a VAT invoice at all thereby avoiding depositing funds into its blocked VAT-account. The VAT "saved" in such a way the sham company will be able to transfer to an unconscientious trader by providing him with “all-loved” consulting services plus, of course, black cash in suitcases.

Let me illustrate this loophole of the new administration system by way of example.

Company A is willing to convert UAH 1 mln. into black cash and still enjoy fake input VAT.  Company A reaches out to Company B (a sham company). The parties enter into a contract for consulting services (Company A is the client, and Company B is the contractor) at the amount of UAH 1 mln., inclusive of UAH 166.66 thousand of VAT. Company A transfer UAH 1 mln. to Company B as an advance payment for the consulting services.

Company B does not hurry with the issuance of the VAT invoice to Company A for the amount of UAH 166.66 thousand. The point here is that for registering such a VAT invoice in the unified register, Company B would have to fund its blocked VAT-account for UAH 166.66 thousand. Instead, Company B seeks a possibility of issuing the VAT invoice to Company A without depositing any funds into its blocked VAT-account.

To this end, Company B buys for the same UAH 1 mln. computer equipment from Company C (a taxable person) and gets for itself a VAT invoice for the amount of UAH 166.66 thousand. The purchase is of true nature. Company B really gets the computer equipment.

Now, having the VAT invoice confirming its entitlement to UAH 166.66 thousand of input VAT, Company B issues a VAT invoice to Company A for the same amount with no funding of its blocked VAT-account.

At the final stage Company B sells the purchased computer equipment to Company D (non-taxable person) for UAH 1.1 mln., including UAH 183.33 thousand of VAT. Again, it is a true nature transaction. The computer equipment actually goes to Company D.

It seems as if there were no options for Company B, but to fund its blocked VAT-account for UAH 183.33 thousand necessary for the issuance of the VAT invoice to Company D. However, Company D resorts to “unexpected maneuver”. It does not issue the VAT invoice and does not record its resultant output VAT in the VAT return.

Company D is not a taxable person and by and large does not need the VAT invoice. Therefore, it will not complain to the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine about Company B failing to issue it with the VAT invoice. Furthermore, the law itself does not provide any enforcement mechanism that can be used to compel Company B to provide Company D with the VAT invoice. A provision setting out 15 days time limit for registering a VAT invoice in the unified register is not enshrined by any effective legal sanctions.

After receiving the funds from Company D Company B illegally converts them into black cash and transfer the obtained black cash to Company A, of course, less of the conversion fees charged.

By the way, the question arises as to the amount of black cash conversion fees. It appears that a 27-30% fee mentioned in my preceding article is rather an overstated amount. Arguing that the amount of the fee would soar that high, I was premised on the assumption that the new administration system would completely close the gap allowing sham companies to evade VAT.

As the aforesaid example shows I was wrong. The new system of administration still permits sham companies to evade VAT, but this will be much more difficult than it is today. Sham companies will incur additional operating expenses. To secure a "deal" they will have to at least carry out a real purchase of goods and find a non-taxable customer ready to buy such goods from them at prices close to market ones.

Given the additional operating expenses, sham companies will charge more for their services. How much will it be - it is difficult to say. However, it is clear that it will be something above the current 7-10%, but below 27-30% suggested in my previous article. Perhaps, it will be something around 12-15%.

What could the government do to block/restrict the VAT-evasion possibilities open to supplies involving non-taxable customers?

In my opinion, the government may consider assigning certain controlling responsibilities to banks or to non-taxable customers, in particular those of them being sole traders or legal entities.

Banks can be prohibited from processing payments made by non-taxable persons to taxable persons, until the taxable person (supplier) provides the bank with the confirmation of the registration of the corresponding VAT invoice in the unified register.

As for non-taxable persons, they could be obliged to complain to the tax authorities about their taxable suppliers failing to provide them with the confirmation of the registration of the VAT invoices in the unified register. This obligation would be appropriate to safeguard by means of a fine being equal to the amount of the VAT for which the VAT invoice should have been issued. The presence of such a significant fine would encourage the non-taxable persons to complain to the tax authorities about the taxable persons failing to issue the VAT invoices. The tax authorities would therefore be able to receive promptly the information about the abuse and would be able to respond to it accordingly.

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Ukrainian VAT-Revolution

The Law of Ukraine of 31 July 2014 № 1621 "On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine" introduced a radically different system of VAT administration. The new system, called the electronic system of administration will take effect from 1 January 2015.

Rationale

The system of electronic administration is called to combat a favorite item of many unconscientious Ukrainian entrepreneurs – conversion of non-cash funds of their enterprises into unaccounted (black) cash. It is quite possible today to transfer a huge amount of money to a sham company for, say, something like "consulting services" and receive that amount, less about 7-10%, in cash. By doing so, an entrepreneur "kills two birds with one stone":

- Reduces the tax burden of VAT and corporate income tax (the costs of the "purchased" services are deductible for the functioning of the both mentioned taxes);

- Utilizes the resultant unaccounted cash for the “purposes of the business activities" (paying salaries “under the table”, all sorts of bribes, etc.), as well as for personal needs (something like paying dividends to yourself).

It is noteworthy that the system of electronic administration will not likely get rid of the business of sham companies at all, but it will strike a severe blow to their effectiveness. An attractive price of 7-10% of the converted money is largely achieved through the evasion of VAT. Sham companies either do not declare output VAT arising from the supply of their goods/services at all, or fail to remit the reported VAT to the state revenues. The electronic system of administration is directed exactly at closing the above VAT evasion possibilities currently available through the recourse to sham companies.

Sham companies will be obliged to pay VAT, and this will mean a significant rise in prices for their services. By adding 20% VAT to the price of 7-10%, we obtain 27-30% price. This price will be high enough to expect a significant decline in the business of the operators of sham companies.

First of all, the new system of administration will benefit the state by enlarging VAT revenues. Conscientious business players will also gain from its introduction. Their unconscientious competitors will no longer receive unjustified tax benefits arising from the “cooperation” with sham companies.
 
How will this work?

Under the current administration system, VAT is payable after the end of a taxable period. A taxable person reports his input and output VAT for a taxable period (as usual, a calendar month) in his VAT return. Where the output VAT exceeds the input VAT, the taxable person remits the surplus to the state revenues. The problem of the current system is the lack of a direct link between a purchaser’s input VAT and a seller’s output VAT. The seller can issue a VAT invoice entitling the purchaser to the enjoyment of the input VAT without either declaring his output VAT or remitting it to the state revenues.
 
The electronic system will make this swindle impossible due to the implementation of the principles of "prepayment": a seller first remits VAT to the state revenues and only after the remittance has actually been made the purchaser can enjoy its input VAT deduction.

The “prepayment” principle is implemented through the introduction of special VAT accounts and the imposition of a limit on the issuance of VAT invoices.

VAT accounts. VAT accounts are special bank accounts on which the amounts of VAT will be held. These bank accounts will be opened in a centralized manner by the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine (hereinafter - "SFSU") for each taxable person. The accounts will be opened automatically. Taxable persons will not have to carry out any formalities for having them opened. All VAT accounts will be opened at Clearing Сenter for Servicing Contracts in the Financial Markets, which has the status of a bank under Ukrainian law.

Funds into VAT accounts will be deposited by only taxable persons to whom such accounts belong. The transfer of funds to these accounts by the counterparties of taxable persons (purchasers of goods/services) will not occur.
The system will work in such a way that the amounts accumulated on VAT accounts are usually equal to the amounts of VAT remittable to the state revenues. Such amounts will be withdrawn by the SFSU itself according to the relevant registers to be submitted to the bank. Moreover, it is envisaged that in the event of VAT deregistration, all the funds held on the VAT account of a deregistered taxable person will be transferred to the state revenuers.

Limit on the issuance of VAT invoices. There will a limit on the issuance of VAT invoices that are not guaranteed by the remitted VAT. There will be a special formula to determine the maximum amount for which a taxable person is eligible to issue a VAT invoice.

The formula is as follows:

Σ VATInv = Σ RecVATinv + Σ Cust + Σ Dep - IssVATinv - Σ Ref -Σ Surp, where:

RecVATinv input VAT under VAT invoices received from suppliers;

Σ Cust –input VAT equal to the amount of VAT remitted to the customs authorities on the importation;

Σ Dep - amount deposited into a VAT account;

Σ IssVATinv – output VAT under VAT invoices issued;

Σ Ref – amount of VAT claimed as VAT refund;

Σ Surp -surplus of the output VAT indicated in VAT returns of a taxable person over the output VAT specified in the VAT invoices issued by him.

The surveillance of the amount for which it will be possible to issue a VAT invoice will be carried out automatically by the system of electronic administration on its own. For the purposes of this surveillance, there will be the cancelation of the printed paper format of VAT invoices and the introduction of all-embracing compulsory registration of VAT invoices in the Unified Register of VAT Invoices (hereinafter - "URVI "). The registration in the URVI will be done, regardless of the amount of VAT concerned. A right to an input VAT deduction will be conferred only by those VAT invoices that have been registered in the URVI.

The aforesaid formula will apply at the stage of the registration of VAT invoices in the URVI to determine whether a VAT invoice is within the specified limit. If the VAT invoice does not fit in with the limit, its registration will be denied. Before registering such a VAT invoice in the URVI, the taxable person should deposit a respective amount of funds into his VAT-account, thereby increasing the above limit to the sufficient level.

Example. As one can see, the new administration system is quite complicated. For a better understanding of how it works, it is worth considering a simple example.

Company A registered as a VAT taxable person on 15 January 2015. On 20 January 2015 it purchased from Company B (VAT taxable person) stationery for UAH 120,000, including UAH 20,000 of VAT. In addition, on 22 January 2015 Company A imported stationery valued at UAU 150,000 and remitted UAH 30,000 of VAT to the customs authorities. On 24 January 2015 Company A supplied all the foregoing stationery to Company C (VAT taxable person) for UAH 420,000, including UAH 70,000 of VAT.

Questions:

1. Should Company C transfer the VAT included in the price of the goods supplied, to the VAT-account of Company A?

2. Does Company A need to deposit some funds into its VAT-account with a view to issue Company C with a respective VAT invoice? If so, what amount it should be?

Answer to the first question. Company C transfers all the funds in return for the purchased goods to the current account of Company A. No funds should be transferred by Company C to the VAT-account of Company A. If needed for the purposes of issuing a VAT invoice to Company C, it is Company A that must deposit funds into its VAT-account out of the funds received from Company C.

Answer to the second question. To determine whether Company A needs to deposit additional funds to its VAT-account for the issuance of a VAT invoice to Company C, the formula given above must be conferred with.

Given that in the case under consideration Company A is a newly registered taxable person, the two following parameters will be decisive in the application of the formula:

- RecVATinv input VAT under VAT invoices received from suppliers and

- Σ Cust VAT remitted to the customs authorities on the importation.

By way of adding RecVATinv, the amount of which is UAH 20,000 (purchasing the stationery from Company B), and Σ Cust, the amount of which is UAH 30,000 (the import of the stationery), together, and subtracting Σ IssVATinv, Σ Ref and Σ Surp equaling collectively to zero, we arrive at UAH 50,000.

Thus, one can conclude that Company A’s limit for the issuance of VAT invoices is UAH 50,000. In order to issue to Company C a VAT invoice for the amount of UAH 70,000 of VAT, Company A should deposit an extra UAH 20,000 into its VAT account. 
 
To what should business be prepared?

Adverse impact on cash flow. With the introduction of the new system of administration, there will be a need for additional liquidity. Under the new system, VAT must be remitted to the state revenues much earlier than it is today.

Currently, the overwhelming majority of taxable persons remit VAT within 30 days after the end of the taxable period (20 days for filing a VAT return, plus 10 days for remitting the tax the state revenues). Under the new system, a taxable person will part with the money much earlier. In the course of a taxable transaction a seller will need to deposit funds into his VAT-account so as to enable the issuance of a VAT invoice to the purchaser. After the transfer of funds to a VAT-account, a taxable person loses the possibility of disposing of such funds. Therefore, the time at which the money is being transferred to a VAT-account can be put on the same footing as the remittance of VAT to the state revenues.

Depending on the time of the implementation of a taxable transaction, the remittance of VAT to the state revenues can occur about 30-60 days earlier. For instance, if a taxable transaction takes place at the beginning of a monthly taxable period, the VAT should be remitted about 60 days earlier. If it takes place at the end of the taxable period, the remittance should be made about 30 days earlier.

Supplies/purchases planning. In view of the new administration system, taxable persons should take a more careful approach to the planning of theirs supplies/purchases to prevent the excessive "freezing" of their working capital on the VAT accounts.

Under the present system of administration the sequence of supplies/purchases made within the same taxable period has no special significance for the determination of the VAT bill. The VAT payable to the state revenues is calculated at the end of the taxable period as a difference between output VAT and input VAT. If this difference is positive, a taxable person remits it to the state revenues. If it is negative, a taxable person can claim it as a VAT refund payable from the state revenues.

Under the new system the sequence of supplies/purchases comes to the fore. An amount which a taxable person should deposit into his VAT-account will be determined at the stage of implementation of a taxable transaction, rather than at the end of the taxable period.

It will be in the interests of taxable persons to organize their work in such a way that the purchases precede the supplies, and not vice versa. Due to such purchases a taxable person will be able to accumulate the input VAT which can be taken into account in the increase in the amount for which it is possible to issue VAT invoices without depositing extra money into the VAT-accounts. Thus, the taxable person will be able to save part of the cash that would have been transferred to the VAT-account had the supply preceded the purchase. 
 
Potential problem for retailers. Para 201-1.4 (“в) of the Tax Code of Ukraine poses a potential problem for retailers and other businesses that sell most of their products/services to customers for cash. This paragraph provides that VAT collected from customers when selling goods/services for cash goes to a VAT-account. 
It is not clear enough from the paragraph at issue whether the transfer of the collected VAT to the VAT-account is a right or an obligation of a taxable person. If the SFSU clings to the position that it is an obligation, retailers and other similar businesses can get in a very difficult situation. The transfer of all the VAT received from the customers to VAT-accounts will mean that those accounts will be in a state of permanent "overpayment" (amounts accumulated on the VAT-accounts will be much greater than those calculated in accordance with the above formula). Given the necessity of complying with a number of formalities for getting the overpaid tax back, the existence of such "overpayments" can be quite a blow to the liquidity of the taxable persons concerned.

It is hoped that DFSU will take a weighted approach to this issue.

In Lieu of Conclusion

The electronic administration system is primarily designed to combat the currently wide-spread illegal business of sham companies concerned with the conversion of black cash. Hopefully, it will succeed in its mission and the above illegal business will quickly shift from a state of prosperity to a deep recession or even sink into oblivion.

In spite of its progressive nature, the electronic system of administration is not deprived of certain drawbacks as compared with the classical system. The new system is more complicated to understand and use. Furthermore, it creates additional pressure on the cash flow of taxable persons. Businesses will need to seek additional financial resources for the implementation of the new system. It is not excluded that such a quest for additional financial resources will lead to a general rise in the prices of goods/services in Ukraine.


* - Photo from www.wikipedia.org