Showing posts with label Personal Income Tax. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Personal Income Tax. Show all posts

Sunday, May 7, 2023

Taxation of Foreign Income of Individuals

It was my pleasure to speak at the meeting of the committee on tax and customs law of the Ukrainian Bar Association on the topic of taxation of foreign income of individuals. 

The most complex and at the same time hottest issue in this context is the issue of taxation of Ukrainian refugees in foreign countries. 

Generally, foreign countries treat Ukrainian refugees as their tax residents. Ukraine is not ready to give up the tax revenues and continues considering such refugees as its own tax residents as well.  

The solution to these intricacies lies in the realm of double tax treaties. At the same time, the least favorable situation seems to exist for the refugee who keeps working remotely in Ukraine under an employment contract.  

There is a risk that, in addition to salary taxes withheld in Ukraine, such a refugee may face in the country of his/her foreign stay foreign income tax and possibly social contributions in respect of his/her Ukrainian salary.

Wednesday, August 24, 2022

The Court Jurisprudence in Cases Involving the Sale of Apartments via Individuals

The resolution of the "Tax Chamber" of the Cassation Administrative Court of 23 May 2022 in case No 810/3116/18 has really made a great gift to real estate developers that had been selling apartments through individuals.

In this resolution the justices concluded that the sellers of real estate that are not registered as individual entrepreneurs (IEs) cannot be taxed as IEs, even if they carry out systematic sales of real estate, which "de facto" make up an entrepreneurial activity. 

This resolution also came in handy for us. Using it as one of the key arguments, we managed to win the case in the Sixth Appellate Administrative Court in August 2022.

However, in my opinion, it is too early to "chill out" in this category of cases and rely solely on the said resolution of the "Tax Chamber". 

A very large percentage of the justices (six justices out of fifteen) did not agree with the majority and expressed a dissenting opinion. So, if such a case is assigned to the dissenting justices, there is a great chance that they will direct the case to the Grand Chamber.

If this happens and the Grand Chamber accept the case for its consideration, it is possible that the approach can change radically.

Saturday, May 16, 2020

BILL No 1210: PERSONAL INCOME TAX (INTERNAL TAXATION)

This is to continue the series of publications on tax changes provided by the Bill № 1210.

This time here is the publication № 2 on changes in the field of personal income tax (limited to internal taxation only):

- The extension of the preferential taxation of real estate items to items of unfinished construction (paragraph 172.1 of the Tax Code of Ukraine);

- The application of the 18% rate to the sale of third and subsequent vehicles by the taxpayer within the same year (paragraph 173.2 of the Tax Code of Ukraine);

- On releasing a mortgage debt, the only mortgage principal will fall under taxation (paragraph 164.2.17 of the Tax Code of Ukraine);

- Fourfold increase in fines for failure to submit or submitting an improperly filled form № 1 DF (Article 119 of the Tax Code of Ukraine);

- The introduction of depreciation of trucks (impossibility of depreciation of cars still remains in place) for individual entrepreneurs liable to the general system of taxation; the only costs of repair but not those of overhaul as before can be directly (without depreciation) attributed to the costs of the taxable period (paragraph 177.4.6 of the Tax Code of Ukraine);

- The elimination of the need to file a tax return in cases of sale / gift / exchange of property that has not triggered any tax liabilities to be remitted to the state revenues (paragraph 179.2 of the Tax Code of Ukraine). 

Monday, May 22, 2017

9% Rate of Personal Income Tax on Dividends: Profound Idea or Banal Error

Why is this important?

The introduction of the 9%  rate of  personal income tax on dividends for specific entities was one of the important changes adopted within the scope of the mini tax reform of 2017. In particular, the 9%  rate was provided for dividend distributions made by non-residents, collective investment institutions and non-payers of corporate income tax, including unified tax payers.  

Why is this change important?

The answer is quite simple: the introduction of  9%  rate can facilitate the removal of some income from the shadows.

Firstly, some wealthy members of the Ukrainian society are allegedly ready to receive  legitimate income from their foreign companies in the form of dividend distributions if those are taxed on the 9%  rate, rather than 18 % rate.       

Secondly, some tax evasion schemes utilized by legal entities subject to unified tax of the third group and aimed at avoiding 18 % tax on dividends may lose their sense.  Such taxpayers may extract their profits by means of dividend distributions instead of transferring them based on “fake nature” deals to the individual  entrepreneurs.  The cost of paying dividends will be higher by few percent points than that of the “services” of the individual entrepreneurs. However, owing to the completely legitimate and risk-free nature of the dividend distribution, we can assume that selection will done in favor of the latter.

Thirdly, applying the reduced rate of personal income tax may promote the legalization of the shadow incomes of small and medium agricultural entrepreneurs. In the vast majority of cases their enterprises are unified  tax payers of the fourth group. We can assume that, if the 9% rate of personal income tax is introduced, the profits of such enterprises will be distributed among their owners by way of dividends,  rather than through various “dark” schemes.          

From what time is it valid?

Determining the time at which the 9%  rate on dividend distribution enters in force is the most interesting point. 

According to the Law of Ukraine of 21 December 2016 No 1797-VIII “On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine on Improving the Investment  Climate in Ukraine” (hereinafter - the “Law on Improving Investment  Climate”)  it was set out that the 9%  rate would take effect after the Law of Ukraine ”On the Service of Financial Investigations” has come into force.   

At first glance, it is a very deep idea.  Is not  it?

At first, instead of the Tax Police the Service of Financial Investigations is created. The Service provides better quality control over the compliance with tax laws. Only after this is accomplished, taxpayers are able to apply the reduced rate of  personal income tax on dividends.

Nonetheless, what was considered to be the  “brilliant” idea proved to be a banal error made in the course of the enactment of  the Law on Improving Investment  Climate.

Eventually, the technical error has been corrected by the Law of Ukraine dated 23 March 2017 No 1989-VIII (hereinafter - the “Law on Clarification”). In particular, this Law repealed the provision of the Law on Improving Investment  Climate under which the introduction of the 9% rate was suspended to the adoption of  the Law of Ukraine ”On the Service of Financial Investigations”.

As a consequence, the 9%  rate of  personal income tax on dividends became applicable starting from 1 January 2017.

How to refund  the tax ?

Although the Law on Clarification introduced 9%  rate of  personal income tax from 1 January 2017, it entered into force from 15 April 2017. The dividends payable for the period from 1 January 2017 to 15 April 2017 were taxed at 18% personal income tax.  
Is it possible to refund the overpaid income tax for the relevant periods and how to do it?

The first thing that, in our opinion, the tax agent* who withheld 18% tax from dividends in the period from 1 January 2017 to 15 April 2017 is supposed to do is to specify the overpaid income tax in the tax return - Form 1DF (ДФ).  

In the column 4a “sum of tax withheld” the tax agent should reflect the sum of the tax at the rate of 9%, and in the column 4 “sum of tax remitted” he should reflect the sum of the tax already paid at the rate of 18%.  After the processing of the tax return the tax authorities must mark the sum of the overpaid tax as refundable and include this information to the integrated card of the taxpayer.        

The question is who has the right to refund the overpaid personal income tax: the tax agent or the taxpayer who received the dividends.

First of all, it is logical that the recipient of the dividends may apply for the refund of the overpaid personal income tax. This right is undoubtedly granted to him as a payer of personal income tax according to section 43 of the Tax Code of Ukraine (the refund of erroneously and/or overpaid taxes). The overpaid personal income tax must be refunded within 20 calendar days after the submission of the relevant application.

The legislation does not expressly entitle the tax agent to refund the overpaid personal  income tax from the state revenues. However, the refund to the tax agents is possible in accordance with the clarification of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine. This clarification has been posted in the publicly available information and reference database "ZIR" (103.07 category). The clarification emphasizes that the tax agent has a right either to refund the overpaid personal income tax or to carry it forward to offset against the tax obligations of the ensuing periods.    
Co-authored by Anton Havryk 

It is clear that following the refund of the tax from the state revenues the tax agent will have to transfer the amount of the refunded tax to the natural person as part of the dividends belonging to the latter.

Lastly, it comes as no surprise that the tax authorities are not usually prone to refund  overpaid taxes to taxpayers in a voluntary fashion. So,  taxpayers and tax agents who are not content to carry the overpaid tax forward ought to be ready to step into a court battle with the tax authorities.

* A person responsible for withholding and remitting personal income tax under the “Pay-as-You-Earn” system.

** Photo from www.pinterest.com


Friday, August 29, 2014

Changed Tax Treatment of Passive Income

Co-authored by Andrii Kuleba 
 (Junior Associate of 
Lavrynovych & Partners Law Firm)
On 2 August 2014 the Act of Ukraine dated 4 July 2014 No. 1588-VII on amending certain laws with regard to the taxation of passive income entered into force.

The main novelties introduced by the Act are as follows:

- Interest, irrespective of its amount, is subject to personal income tax (PIT). Previously, only the interest over UAH 20,706.00 per year was chargeable to PIT.

- Interest accrued on bank accounts used exclusively for the payment of salaries is not within the charge to PIT.

- Interest is taxed at a PIT flat rate of 15%. A progressive rate of PIT (15%, 20% and 25%) is no more applicable.

- PIT on interest and dividends is withheld by the paying entity (tax agent). The taxpayer is not supposed to file an annual tax return.

- Tax agent does not disclose the information on a taxpayer and the amount of his/her bank deposit in a tax computation (return) to be filed with the tax authority with respect to the accrual of the interest.

- There is a possibility to adjust a PIT liability in case of the recalculation of the interest caused by the early termination of the bank deposit agreement.

- Dividends are taxed at a 5% rate of PIT on a regular basis. Formerly, the application of the 5% rate was only possible over a transitional period ended 1 January 2015. After this date a progressive tax rate (15%, 20% and 25%) was expected to operate.


* - Photo from www.biggerpockets.com

 

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Personal Income Tax Reporting Changes

Photo from http://pon.org.ua
The Law of Ukraine No 4661-VI dated 24 April 2012 "On Amendments to Tax Code of Ukraine and Some Other Laws of Ukraine Regarding Tax Reporting” came into force on 28 April 2012. The law slightly modified the approach to personal income tax reporting. The amendments affected the matters indicated below.

Firstly, the law extended the deadline for submitting an annual tax return on property and income (hereinafter – “Annual Return”) with a view to qualify for a personal income tax rebate (amendments to paras 49.18.4 and 166.1.2 of the Tax Code of Ukraine). The deadline was extended from 1 May of a year following the taxable year to 31 December of this year.

This is where a taxpayer is not required to file the Annual Return by virtue of law, but rather lodges it voluntarily in order to be eligible for a personal income tax rebate. As it is well known, a tax rebate is the reduction of taxable income by the amount of certain expenses permitted by law (such as interest on a residential mortgage loan, the value of medical or educational services) and a tax refund resulting from such a reduction.

Secondly, the modifications concerned the declaration of the income received from several tax agents for the purposes of the application of 17% tax rate. The amendments were made to para 176.1 (“є”) of the Tax Code of Ukraine.

From this time onwards, while determining whether a taxable person receiving the income resulting from his labour relations or his performance of civil contracts from several tax agents, is under the obligation to hand in the Annual Return the annual rather than monthly taxable income is taken into account. While formerly the Annual Return had to be filed if the amount of the taxable income in any month of a year exceeded 10 statutory minimum wages, nowadays, the taxable person is mandated to do so if the yearly amount of the taxable income exceeds 120 statutory minimum wages.

The amendments set forth the recalculation mechanism in relation to the submission of the Annual Return on the above ground. The recalculation mechanism, by itself, is not complicated. The total taxable income declared is reduced by the amount of unified social contribution accrued (withheld) by the tax agents and by the amount of social tax benefits (if any). Of the reduced amount of the total taxable income, 120 statutory minimum wages are taxed at 15 per cent, and the rest is taxed at 17 per cent. The tax charged on the reduced amount of the taxable income decreases by the amount of tax actually accrued (withheld) by the tax agents during the taxable year. The surplus of the tax is payable to the budget within the prescribed term (by 1 August of a year following the taxable year).

In light of the above, the approval of a new appendix to the Annual Return reflecting the results of the aforesaid recalculation is expected soon. Probably it will be the appendix No 8.

Monday, September 12, 2011

Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine (Personal Income Tax)


Closing the series of the posts devoted to the amendments made to the Tax Code of Ukraine by the Law No 3609-VI (draft law No 8217), at this stage I would like to focus on those of them related to personal income taxation. Please, bear in mind that in my posts of 29 July 2011, 18 August 2011 and 6 September 2011 I already outlined the amendments brought by this law with regard to the administration of taxes, VAT and corporate income tax, respectively.

Hence, personal income taxation was confronted with the following changes:

- it is clarified that, similarly to salaries, the unified social contribution does not constitute the tax base for the income derived from works (services) performed (rendered) under civil agreements;

- it is specified that a taxpayers is entitled to utilize tax discount only by the end of the year following the reporting year;

- it is determined that in the case a tax agent has accrued the income in favor of a taxpayer, but has not paid it to the taxpayer yet, such a tax agent is still under obligation to remit the personal income tax to the state budget and must do so within the period established by the Tax Code of Ukraine for the monthly reporting period;

- the approach to the recognition of securities traders, including banks, as tax agents was altered. While formerly they were considered tax agents provided that the respective agreement had been entered into with the taxpayer, pursuant to the amendments made they are treated as tax agents irrespective of the conclusion of the mentioned agreement.

- the list of incomes and expenses taken into account while assessing derivatives transaction was set forth.